Monthly Archives: February 2012

Many parents who decide top homeschool their kids do this realizing that many factors go into their decision, one of which is the fact that their kids would not be capable to take part in the sports offered publically schools. Tim Tebow the favorite quarterback who was simply homeschooled and permitted to experience his senior high school eleven where he excelled and went on to great things on the university of Florida has inspired homeschoolers to try to play sports of their area. There is also a bill in Richmond Virginia named for him the Tim Tebow law if passed, House Bill 947, will allow homeschoolers to experiment with sports with a public school.

But it is not that easy there are several people that would resist homeschoolers which might be permitted to play public sports alongside students who require to meet up with certain grade and behavior requirements to play. They even suggest forming their particular leagues and teams or joining other associations outside of public schools, church groups, YMCA, or other athletic clubs. Many parents of public school students question the fairness and hypocrisy of wanting their kids on public school teams, these parents spurned the institution because it had not been good enough for his or her children and now only want to take part in certain aspects.

Naturally the normal rebuttal because of this argument from homeschooling parents is they pay taxes too and enjoy the to certainly play on public school teams. This really is potentially one of the most overstated argument when discussing this issue and it is demeaning on the homeschool movement. There are numerous people that pay taxes and do not have children yet they don’t be given a refund, many individuals go years without the need for police or firemen, yet they don’t receive refunds for which they do not use. So claiming that you simply pay taxes is not a quarrel for why children deserve to be involved publically school sports. It is usually not a constitutional right you are allowed to play sports. By way of example, in 1996, a brand new York appellate court ruled against a homeschooler whose local school district denied him use of interscholastic sports. The judge held that, “[P]articipation in interscholastic sports is just an expectation without fundamental right is involved…” Bradstreet v. Sobol, 650 N.Y.S.2d 402, 403 (A.D.3 Dept 1996).

Talking about other case precedent round the country, the Top court of Montana decided that “participation in extracurricular activities had not been an essential right.” (supra. 1316) The judge was struggle to conclude “a personal school student’s curiosity about engaged in public school extracurricular activities is a bit more important compared to the school district’s policy decision… which it would need to restrict participation to the students who definitely are enrolled in people school system.” Kaptein v. Conrad School District, 931 P.2nd 1311, 1317 (Mont 1997).

While the debate for homeschoolers to learn public sports are going to be decide by local laws, we must understand that these include children in case were to deny them the legal right to play in the public schools we must afford them every probability to play in organized sports it would be unfair to seal a door without opening one more.